A team of scientists analyzed 14 survey programs carried out by state and federal agencies, as well as UC Davis, and concluded that employing such a diverse variety of long-term surveys is essential for accurately tracking and assessing the overall health of San Francisco Estuary’s ecosystem and its resident fishes. The research is described in the June issue of San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science. Lead author Dylan Stompe, of UC Davis, explains that the research arose from concerns that too many people – reporters included – have relied on the results of one annual survey, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s Fall Midwater Trawl, to make sweeping conclusions about the health and abundance of several fish species. The trawl, which samples 122 sites in San Pablo Bay and the Delta, has captured fewer and fewer individuals of several species almost every year. This has raised legitimate concern that these fishes, which include Delta smelt and longfin smelt, are nearing extinction. These species have undoubtedly declined dramatically, Stompe says, but when data from multiple surveys are analyzed together, “the story gets more complicated. We still see a long-term decline [in several fish species] but it’s much more muted,” he says. Stompe poses an explanation: The Fall Midwater Trawl uses geographically fixed sampling sites in a sediment-based ecosystem that is shifting constantly. Over time, this could produce data trends that reflect habitat changes, not necessarily trends in fish populations. Stompe and his coauthors concluded that overlaying the results of multiple surveying efforts produces more accurate summaries of significant population trends and ecological changes. Unfortunately, this doesn’t change the prognosis much for the endangered Delta smelt: “They’re definitely in bad shape,” Stompe says. “All the surveys are now having trouble catching them.”

Pearls in the ocean of information that our reporters didn’t want you to miss
Trawl survey in the North Delta. Photo courtesy of Dylan Stompe
 

By looking solely at the results of a single annual fish-counting survey, Californians may be seeing an incomplete reflection of Bay-Delta fish population trends.

A team of scientists analyzed 14 survey programs carried out by state and federal agencies, as well as UC Davis, and concluded that employing such a diverse variety of long-term surveys is essential for accurately tracking and assessing the overall health of San Francisco Estuary’s ecosystem and its resident fishes. The research is described in the June issue of San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science. Lead author Dylan Stompe, of UC Davis, explains that the research arose from concerns that too many people – reporters included – have relied on the results of one annual survey, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s Fall Midwater Trawl, to make sweeping conclusions about the health and abundance of several fish species. The trawl, which samples 122 sites in San Pablo Bay and the Delta, has captured fewer and fewer individuals of several species almost every year. This has raised legitimate concern that these fishes, which include Delta smelt and longfin smelt, are nearing extinction. These species have undoubtedly declined dramatically, Stompe says, but when data from multiple surveys are analyzed together, “the story gets more complicated. We still see a long-term decline [in several fish species] but it’s much more muted,” he says. Stompe poses an explanation: The Fall Midwater Trawl uses geographically fixed sampling sites in a sediment-based ecosystem that is shifting constantly. Over time, this could produce data trends that reflect habitat changes, not necessarily trends in fish populations. Stompe and his coauthors concluded that overlaying the results of multiple surveying efforts produces more accurate summaries of significant population trends and ecological changes. Unfortunately, this doesn’t change the prognosis much for the endangered Delta smelt: “They’re definitely in bad shape,” Stompe says. “All the surveys are now having trouble catching them.”

About the author

A resident of Sonoma County, Alastair Bland is a freelance journalist who writes about water policy in California, rivers and salmon, marine conservation, and climate change. His work has appeared at CalMatters, NPR.org, Smithsonian.com, Yale Environment 360, and the East Bay Express, among many other outlets. When he isn't writing, Alastair can often be found riding a bicycle, pulling weeds from his garden, and holding his breath underwater.

Related Posts

Climate change is heating, salinizing, and expanding the San Francisco Estuary, a review of nearly 200 scientific studies concludes.

Sea level rise, changing snow and rainfall patterns, and warmer waters are some of the changes already observed in the Estuary and expected to continue through the rest of the century as greenhouse gas concentrations rise. Changes to water are at the heart of the documented and further expected impacts;...

Groundwater pumped from subsided islands back into Delta channels through 200 or more active outfalls can be laden with excess nitrogen transported from island soils, report the authors of a new study.

The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta contains more than 50 peat islands. Most have subsided—some as much as three meters — as a result of drainage for farming, and must maintain artificial water tables below the land surface via managed pumping. According to researchers from the University of California at Santa Cruz...

A large pulse of water sent through the Yolo Bypass in summer 2016 boosted phytoplankton biomass and food web conditions in Cache Slough and the lower Sacramento River, a new report confirms.

 “Our goal was to improve estuarine habitat by increasing net flows through the Cache Slough Complex to enhance downstream transport of lower trophic-level resources, an important driver for fish such as the endangered Delta Smelt,” write the authors—including esteemed (and recently retired) California Department of Water Resources lead scientist Ted...